Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28798/2026 of SACHIDANANDA PRADHAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28798 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010686122026 Sachidananda Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. S. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 10.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.28798 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010686122026

Sachidananda Pradhan

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Jena, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.09.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging the notice issued on 12.08.2026 under Annexure-7 directing the Petitioner to vacate the Government Quarter bearding No.E-2/2 and a contention was raised that since Petitioner’s original posting is at Malkangiri which comes under KBK area, Petitioner is entitled to continue in the quarter, but in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly contended that if Petitioner will be allowed time till 31.10.2026, he will vacate the quarter suo-motu.

// 2 //

4. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State has no serious objection to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner.

5. Considering the submission, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition without interfering with the impugned notice dtd.12.08.2026 permits the Petitioner to continue in the quarter in question till 31.10.2026. However, Petitioner is directed to vacate the quarter suo-motu by 31.10.2026. Petitioner is also directed to furnish an undertaking in that regard before Opposite Party No.4 along with copy of this order that he will vacate the quarter suo-motu by 31.10.2026.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat

Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:43:37 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead