Orissa High Court
CRLMP/1329/2026 of KANHU CHARAN PRADHAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.1329 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010388862026 Kanhu Charan Pradhan …. Petitioner Ms. Monika Samal, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.1329 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010388862026
Kanhu Charan Pradhan
….
Petitioner
Ms. Monika Samal, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.
ORDER
10.09.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to the opposite parties and in particular, opposite party No.3 to register the FIR on the basis of the complaint dated 17th November, 2024 at Annexure-1 with such other reliefs sought for on the grounds stated.
3. Ms. Samal, learned counsel submits that there is medical negligence on the part of the accused named in the complaint but even after lodging of the same, no case has been registered. The further claim is that intimation has been given to opposite party No.2 as per Annexure-2 but it has not yielded any result. The claim is that the said intimation has been received by opposite party No.2 in the meantime sent by Post referring to the postal receipt at Annexure-3 and the postal tracking report i.e. Annexure-4. Recording such submission and since a complaint is lodged by the petitioner alleging negligence on the part of a doctor, this Court recording the submission of Mr. Mohanty, learned ASC for the State is inclined to direct opposite party No.3 to examine the same and if in case, a gross medical negligence is prima facie proved, to take appropriate legal action and if necessary, to register the same as FIR and proceed thereafter in accordance with law.
4. Hence, it is ordered.
5. In the result, the CRLMP stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid for compliance by opposite party No.3 soon after receiving a copy of this order.
6. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.
7. A copy to the State for intimation to opposite party No.3 for early compliance.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
T.Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:29:15 Signature Not Verified