Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28393/2026 of SRIKANTA KUMAR DHIR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28393 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010670402026 Srikanta Kumar Dhir ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC Mr. S.K. Patra, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28393 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010670402026
Srikanta Kumar Dhir
.....
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
Mr. S.K. Patra, Adv.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
10.09.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to revise the pay of the petitioner in the pay level-9 of the pay matrix under ORSP Rules, 2017 as he was in receipt of the grade pay of Rs.4200/- in the 3rd RACP as it evident from the Government order dated 27.04.2026; And further the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to refix the pay and pension of the petitioner in the enhance rate in the pay Level-9 under ORSP Rules, 2017 and to grant him the differential arrears, within a stipulated period as deem fit and peroper; And/or pass any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case;
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2.
And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 11-Sep-2026 11:10:38 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…