Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28635/2026 of HELEN DAS Vs ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSION, ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28635 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010640162026 Helen Das ..... Petitioner Mr. M.M. Patnaik, Advocate -versus- Addl. Central Provident Fund Commission, Odisha, BBSR & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 28635 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010640162026

Helen Das

.....

Petitioner

Mr. M.M. Patnaik, Advocate

-versus-

Addl. Central Provident Fund

Commission, Odisha, BBSR &

Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.09.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that let this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opposite Party to settle the EPF claim and other pensioner benefit within a stipulated period time as this Hon'ble Court think and proper; And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/ directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

Page 2 of 2.

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 11-Sep-2026 11:10:38 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead