WP(C)/27017/2026 of BABITA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “Under the aforesaid circumstances morefully narrated herein above the petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, call for the records, issue notice to show cause to opposite parties as to why the petitioners land shall not be demarcated in demarcation case No. 179/2026 failing to show cause or show insufficient cause issue the appropriate writ in directing the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar i.e. O.P. No. 3 to demarcate the schedule as per direction made vide letter No. 27006 dt. 17.07.2026 within time stipulated under Anneuxre-4. And pass such further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper;. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

4. The petitioner claims to have submitted an application before Order No.

01. 2 | P a g e

the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar for demarcation of his land being Demarcation Case No. 179 of 2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no steps have been taken in the demarcation proceeding so far.

5. Having regard to the limited grievance of the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to dispose of the demarcation case filed by the petitioner as early as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge

Deepak Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 10:52:10 Signature Not Verified