Orissa High Court
WP(C)/646/2014 of SUNITA PADHI Vs MGT.I/C-NAYAGARH DI on 9 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 646 of 2014 CNR No.ODHC010199612014 Sunita Padhi ..... Petitioner Mr. U. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- MGT, I/C-Nayagarh Dist., Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 646 of 2014
CNR No.ODHC010199612014
Sunita Padhi
.....
Petitioner
Mr. U. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
MGT, I/C-Nayagarh Dist.,
Central Co-operative Bank
Ltd. & Anr.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026 Order No. 04
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the above facts and circumstances this petitioner therefore humbly prays that your lordships may graciously be pleased to:-
i) Admit the writ application; and
ii) Call for the records; and
iii) issue a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writs/Orders commanding to the Opposite Parties for allowing her to continue as a computer operator in the Bank with effect from her joining dtd 23.09.2013 with as usual salaries within a time limit; And iv) May pass any other appropriate order(s)/writ(s)/ direction(s) as the Hon'ble High Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.
Page 2 of 2. And for this act of kindness this petitioner as in duty bound shall pray forever.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Sep-2026 15:32:58 Signature Not Verified