Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28171/2026 of BIBHU PADARBINDA SAMANTARAY Vs OSRTC (BOARD), BHUBANESWAR on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28171 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010659932026 Bibhu Padarbinda Samantaray …. Petitioner Mr. K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- OSRTC (Board), Bhubaneswar & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.28171 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010659932026

Bibhu Padarbinda

Samantaray

….

Petitioner

Mr. K. Nayak, Advocate

-versus-

OSRTC (Board),

Bhubaneswar & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.09.2026

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dt.04.07.2025 so passed by Opp. Party No.1 under Annexure-8, but in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that seeking review of order dt.04.07.2025, Petitioner though has filed a Review Petition on 03.01.2026 under Anexure-9, but the same is yet to be disposed of in accordance with law.

3.1. It is accordingly contended that Opp. party No.1 be directed to take a decision on the Review application filed

// 2 //

by the Petitioner under Annexure-9 within a stipulated time period.

4. Even though notice of the Writ Petition has not been issued, but taking into account the nature of order going to be passed, this Court is of the view that no notice need be issued.

5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, considering the submission made and the fact that a Review has been filed seeking review of order dt.04.07.2025 so passed by Opp. party No.1 under Annexure-8, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opp. Party No.1 to take a lawful decision on the Review Petition so filed by the Petitioner under Anenxure- 9, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 2(two) months from the date of receipt of this order.

6. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Jyoti

Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Sep-2026 15:32:58 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead