Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27179/2026 of GAJANAN DANSANA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.27179 of 2026 ODHC010635892026 Gajanan Dansana …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. G.K.Routray, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Party Represented by Mr. D.Lenka, Additional Govt. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE
1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.27179 of 2026
ODHC010635892026
Gajanan Dansana
….
Petitioner
Represented by
Mr. G.K.Routray, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors
….
Opposite Party
Represented by
Mr. D.Lenka,
Additional Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
09.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Curt may graciously be pleased to admit the case, issue Rule Nisi in nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ(s) as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper by calling upon the Opp.Parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dtd. 21.11.2024 passed by the Opp.Party No.5 under Annexure-4 shall not be set aside and if the Opp.Parties fail to show cause or show any insufficient cause, the rule be made absolute. And in the interest of justice the impugned order dtd. 21.11.2024 passed by Opp.Party No.5 may kindly be set aside. And for which act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
4. Since order impugned can be challenged in appeal before the appropriate authority, the writ application is disposed of granting Order No.
01. 2 | P a g e
liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within two weeks from today. If such appeal is preferred within the stipulated period along with an application seeking condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall condone the delay and hear the appeal on its own merits as early as possible.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Deepak Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 10:52:10 Signature Not Verified