Orissa High Court

WP(C)/22445/2025 of BHIM BAHADUR GURUNG Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010565052025 Bhim Bahadur Gurung …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv. (for O.P. NO.6)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025

CNR No. ODHC010565052025

Bhim Bahadur Gurung

….

Petitioner

Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA

Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv.

(for O.P. NO.6)

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.09.2026

6.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard.

3. Perused the office note as well as the tracking report.

4. From the office note and tracking report, it is found that notice on Opp. Party Nos.7,8,14,20 & 21 has come back after valid service and notice on Opp. Party Nos.4,9,10,11,13,15 & 18 has been duly served. It is also found that notice on Opp. Party No.12 has been duly served and as per tracking report, notice on Opp. Party No.5 has been duly delivered. It is also found from the office note that Opp. Party Nos.16 & 17 refused to accept the notice. However, Mr. M.K. Pati, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of Opp. Party No.6.

// 2 //

5. In view of the same and taking into account the appearance of Mr. M.K. Pati, learned counsel on behalf of Opp. Party No.6, this Court held the service of notice on all the private Opp. Parties as sufficient.

6. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is covered by the judgment passed by this Court on 22.01.2026 in W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025 & batch.

7. In view of such submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with quashing of the order under Annexures- 6 & 7, in the light of the judgment so passed in W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025 & batch.

Photocopy of the order be placed in the connected cases.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge

Sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead