Orissa High Court
WP(C)/22482/2025 of BAL BAHADUR THAPA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010565052025 Bhim Bahadur Gurung …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv. (for O.P. NO.6)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025
CNR No. ODHC010565052025
Bhim Bahadur Gurung
….
Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA
Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv.
(for O.P. NO.6)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026
6.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard.
3. Perused the office note as well as the tracking report.
4. From the office note and tracking report, it is found that notice on Opp. Party Nos.7,8,14,20 & 21 has come back after valid service and notice on Opp. Party Nos.4,9,10,11,13,15 & 18 has been duly served. It is also found that notice on Opp. Party No.12 has been duly served and as per tracking report, notice on Opp. Party No.5 has been duly delivered. It is also found from the office note that Opp. Party Nos.16 & 17 refused to accept the notice. However, Mr. M.K. Pati, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of Opp. Party No.6.
// 2 //
5. In view of the same and taking into account the appearance of Mr. M.K. Pati, learned counsel on behalf of Opp. Party No.6, this Court held the service of notice on all the private Opp. Parties as sufficient.
6. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is covered by the judgment passed by this Court on 22.01.2026 in W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025 & batch.
7. In view of such submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with quashing of the order under Annexures- 6 & 7, in the light of the judgment so passed in W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025 & batch.
Photocopy of the order be placed in the connected cases.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44 Signature Not Verified