Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27774/2026 of SURESH CHANDRA SWAIN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27774 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010649382026 Suresh Chandra Swain ..... Petitioner Mr. B.K. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 27774 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010649382026
Suresh Chandra Swain
.....
Petitioner
Mr. B.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026 Order No. 01
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to consider the facts stated in the writ petition, admit the same, issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opp.Parties to show cause and may kindly issue writ in the nature of Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to implement Office Order No.291/2F(NG)-261/2005 dated 01.03.2014 insofar as it grants one advance increment in favour of the Petitioner under Annexure-4. And further direct the Opp. Parties to revise/fix the Petitioner's pay by giving effect to the one advance increment from the date of completion of training at Mooney Forest Guard Trainee School, Angul, i.e., 30.06.1992 within a stipulated time.
Page 2 of 2. If the Opp.Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause then the rule may kindly be made absolute. And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions, writ/writs as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.6 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.6 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Sep-2026 15:32:58 Signature Not Verified