Orissa High Court

BLAPL/7045/2026 of HAPI @ TUSARKANTA BEHERA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7045 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010511912026 Hapi @ Tusarkanta Behera … Petitioner Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL)09.09.2026 01.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.7045 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010511912026

Hapi @ Tusarkanta Behera

…

Petitioner

Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL)09.09.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Tigiria PS Case No.73 of 2018 corresponding to ST Case No.104 of 2025 pending in the file of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Athagarh for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 395/120-B of IPC r/w Sec.25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act.

2. Heard, Mr. Pravash Chandra Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the present matter and perused the record.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner was granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in BLAPL No.4187 of 2019, but this is a bail jump case and the NBWA was issued against the petitioner on 08.05.2026 when he failed to appear before the trial Court and no step was taken on his behalf, however, the petitioner was taken into custody on 20.05.2026 on the strength of such NBWA and since then, he is in custody and thereby, the petitioner must have felt the rigor of law by remaining in custody for flouting the orders of the Court. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court by taking a lenient view admits the petitioner to bail.

4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper with following condition:-

(i) the petitioner in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

Jayakrushna

Digitally Signed Signed by: JAYAKRUSHNA DASH Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 19:40:01 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead