Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/8823/2026 of MINAKETAN SAMAL Vs STATE OF ODISHA(VIG.) on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.8823 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010547062026 Minaketan Samal …. Petitioner Mr.S. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha (Vigilance) …. Opposite Party Mr.M.S. Rizvi, Counsel for the Vigilance CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.8823 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010547062026

Minaketan Samal

….

Petitioner

Mr.S. Mohanty, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha (Vigilance)

….

Opposite Party

Mr.M.S. Rizvi,

Counsel for the Vigilance

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.09.2026

02.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Vigilance G.R. Case No.3 of 2026 pending on the file of learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Keonjhar, arising out of Cuttack Vigilance P.S. Case No.7 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 13(2) read with section 13(1)(a) of P.C. Act and sections 406/409/120-B of the IPC.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that since the Petitioner has joined the investigation and taking into account the nature of allegations, his custodial interrogation is not warranted. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned Counsel for the Vigilance, while not opposing such submission of the Petitioner joining the investigation, he ought not to be protected by pre-arrest bail.

5. Considering the rival submissions, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the on going investigation. Liberty is granted to the Vigilance Department to seek variance of the order in the event the Petitioner does not extend the desire cooperation.

7. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(V. Narasingh)

Judge Basu Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 12-Sep-2026 16:57:19 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead