Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28904/2011 of NABANI BEWA and ORS. Vs BIJOY KU.ROUT and ORS on 9 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28904 of 2011 [CNR No.- ODHC010323832011 ] 1. Nabani Bewa 2. Nakhi @ Laxmi Senapati 3. Maki @ Malati Behera 4. Sakhi Behera 5. Purnima @ Puni Behera 6. Kuni Behera …. Petitioners None -versus- 1. Bijoy Kumar Rout 2. Kailash Muduli 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28904 of 2011
[CNR No.- ODHC010323832011 ]
1. Nabani Bewa
2. Nakhi @ Laxmi Senapati
3. Maki @ Malati Behera
4. Sakhi Behera
5. Purnima @ Puni Behera
6. Kuni Behera
….
Petitioners
None
-versus-
1. Bijoy Kumar Rout
2. Kailash Muduli
3. Ramesh Muduli
….
Opp. Parties
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
03. 09.09.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This matter has been listed under the heading “For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive- Mediation ‘For The Nation’ ”.
2. As no counsel appeared on behalf of the Parties the matter was passed over in the first hour.
3. When the matter is taken up after recess no counsel appears on behalf of the Petitioners, Opposite Party No. 1 or Opposite Parties No.2 and 3, although counsels have been engaged by the Petitioners as well as the Opposite Party No. 1 and Opposite Parties No.2, and 3.
4. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 15.10.2011 passed in Civil Suit No. 494 of 2007, where petition filed by the Defendants No.2 and 3 for staying the suit till disposal of FAO No. 72 of 2011, has been allowed.
5. On 29.11.2011, notice has been issued to the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 by normal process and Opposite Party No.1 by special messenger, fixing the next date to 07.12.2011.
6. But the matter was not been listed on 29.11.2011 and has been listed today. Almost 15 years have elapsed since the impugned order was passed.
7. As no counsel is appearing on behalf of the Parties it can safely be presumed that in the meanwhile, either Civil Suit No. 494 of 2007 or FAO No. 72 of 2011 have been disposed of.
8. Hence no useful purpose will be served by keeping this writ petition pending.
9. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 20:20:57 Signature Not Verified