Orissa High Court
WP(C)/17303/2026 of PUNA CHANDRA RANA Vs ODISHA INFORMATION COMMISSION, BHUBANESWAR on 9 September 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.17303 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010408092026 Puna Chandra Rana …. Petitioner Ms. Astami Tandia, Advocate -versus- Odisha Information Commission, Bhubaneswar and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Smruti Ranjan Dash, Advocate for O.P. No.1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.17303 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010408092026
Puna Chandra Rana
….
Petitioner
Ms. Astami Tandia, Advocate
-versus-
Odisha Information Commission,
Bhubaneswar and another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Smruti Ranjan Dash, Advocate
for O.P. No.1
Mr. Suryakanta Parhi, ASC for O.P.
No.2
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026
03.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that this writ petition has been filed for a direction to supply information by the Public Information Officer, Jajpur Block (Opposite Party No.2).
2. Upon receiving instruction from the Odisha Information Commission, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.1 by furnishing a copy of the decision dated 30th July, 2026 passed by the State Chief Information Commissioner, Bhubaneswar in Second Appeal No.4760 of 2023 in Court today, submitted that alleging non-supply of information by the Public Information Officer, the petitioner approached the Odisha Information Commission-opposite party no.1 for doing the needful. He further submitted that in view of such decision dated 30th July, 2026, no direction is warranted to be issued in the present matter to the Public Information Officer, Jajpur
Block though the petitioner had applied seeking information to the District Civil Supply Officer, Jajpur in Form-A appended to Rule 4 of the Odisha Right to Information Rules, 2005, read with Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.1 and learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-opposite party no.2
4. On perusal of record, it reveals that though the information has been sought for by filing an application in Form-A to the Public Information Officer in the District Civil Supply Office, Jajpur District, the Public Information Officer, Jajpur Block, Jajpur is arrayed as a party in the present proceeding. Be that be, perusal of decision dated 30th July, 2026 passed in Second Appeal No.4760 of 2023 by the Odisha Information Commission, it is revealed that: “1. In the present case, the appellant had submitted his application in questionnaire format. This application should have been straightway rejected by the PIO.
2. However, records reveal that the PIO had given a suitable reply to the appellant on 24.11.2023.
3. During hearing, the appellant stated the he had received all information but was unhappy that the arrears of his PDS rice was not delivered to his home.
4. The Commission explained to the appellant that no direction for delivery of rations can be given under the RTI Act.
5. Accordingly, the present second appeal is disposed since all requisite information has already been provided to the appellant.
Given under the hand and seal of the Commission.”
5. In view of such decision, no further direction is required to be passed in the present writ petition. Hence, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 16:52:06 Signature Not Verified