Orissa High Court
CRLREV/503/2025 of SURAJ SEKHAR NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.503 of 2025 (CNR No.ODHC010557102025) Suraj Sekhar Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. B.S. Dasparida, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & another …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panda, ASC Mr. Mahes Das, Advocate (O.P. No.2) CORAM: MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.503 of 2025
(CNR No.ODHC010557102025)
Suraj Sekhar Nayak
….
Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Dasparida, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Panda, ASC
Mr. Mahes Das, Advocate
(O.P. No.2)
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026
04. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Instant revision is filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order of cognizance dated 29th May, 2025 passed in connection with C.T. Case No.319 of 2025 by the learned J.M.F.C., G. Udayagiri as at Annexure-3 on the grounds stated.
3. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1 and a copy of the chargesheet i.e. Annexure-2.
4. Mr. Dasparida, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that NBWA is pending execution against the petitioner after the submission of chargesheet i.e. Annexure-2. Mr. Das, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 submits that a case is made out and hence, the order of cognizance has been passed by the learned court below as per Annexure-3 on a satisfaction reached at that the offences under Sections 296/351(2) BNS have been committed by the petitioner.
5. Considering the FIR and the chargesheet as at Annexures-1 & 2 respectively and the submissions of learned counsel for both the sides, this Court is of the view that there is no merit in the revision and hence, the order of cognizance dated 29th May, 2025 at Annexure-3 does not call for any interference. But, at the same time, having regard to the fact that the offences are triable by a Magistrate First Class, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to surrender before the learned court below for being released on bail with suitable conditions imposed.
6. Accordingly, it is ordered.
7. In the result, the CRLREV stands dismissed and disposed of, however, with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court of the learned J.M.F.C., G. Udayagiri on or before 18th September, 2026 in connection with C.T. Case No.319 of 2025 for being released on bail with suitable conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and until such surrender, there shall be no coercive against him.
8. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Alok Digitally Signed Signed by: ALOK RANJAN SETHY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:20:50 Signature Not Verified