Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28904/2026 of SULOCHANA DEVI Vs REGISTRAR CIVIL COURT, DHENKANAL on 9 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28904 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010680062026 Sulochana Devi …. Petitioner Ms. S.Nayak, Advocate -versus- Registrar Civil Court, Dhenkanal …. Opposite Party CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 09.09.2026 Order No. 01. 1. The matter
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28904 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010680062026
Sulochana Devi
….
Petitioner
Ms. S.Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Registrar Civil Court, Dhenkanal
….
Opposite Party
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026 Order No.
01.
1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Ms. Nayak, learned counsel for the Petitioner
3. It is submitted by Ms. Nayak, learned counsel for the Petitioner that the final decree proceeding in T.S.No.10 of 1996 (F.D.) is pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamakhyanagar since 2015. It is further submitted that there is no impediment or stay in proceeding with the final decree proceeding.
4. The Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the learned Court to dispose of her pending application in the final decree proceeding.
5. It is seen that the Defendants in the suit are not arrayed as parties in present writ petition. As per order dated 2nd March 2026, the prayer of the Petitioner as an intervener was allowed by the Court in the final decree proceeding, where she was not a Defendant in the original Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 17:22:08 Signature Not Verified proceeding. Being asked to array the Defendants as parties in the present writ petition, learned counsel for the Petitioner expresses her reluctance.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in absence of the necessary parties.
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
S.Das Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 17:22:08 Signature Not Verified