Orissa High Court
WP(C)/33039/2023 of SATYABRATA PADHI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 33039 of 2023 CNR No. ODHC010808922023 Satyabrata Padhi ..... Petitioner Mr. A.C. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 33039 of 2023
CNR No. ODHC010808922023
Satyabrata Padhi
.....
Petitioner
Mr. A.C. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.....
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026 Order No. 05
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court in the fact and circumstances of the case, issue Rule Nisi, calling upon the Opp. parties to show cause as to why they shall not be commanded to pay the entire service benefits including the pension to the petitioner and refund the illegally deducted sums of Rs.1,09,259/- which is evident from Annexure-3, and allow the writ petition with cost; And for which act of your kindness, petitioner shall as in duty bound, ever pray.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh
Page 2 of 2. representation before Opp. Party No. 4 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 4 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 4 be communicated to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:48:07 Signature Not Verified