Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28198/2026 of GURU PANGI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28198 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010646422026 Guru Pangi ..... Petitioner Mr. D. P. Panigrahi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 28198 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010646422026

Guru Pangi

.....

Petitioner

Mr. D. P. Panigrahi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.09.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that your Lordships may be pleased to direct the State/O.Ps to disburse the duty pay/salary of the petitioner from 1.3.2026 onwards immediately basing on Last pay drawn in the previous post of Khalasi in W/C Estt.as on 28.2.2026 A.N. pending finalisation of pay protection by taking an undertaking from the petitioner to the effect that after protection of pay if it is found that any excess amount has been paid to the petitioner, the same amount will be recovered from either from his pay or any other dues payable to him. And pass any other order/orders as deemed fit and proper in the ends of justice. And for which act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

Page 2 of 2.

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.4 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.4 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.4 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Subrat/Utkalika Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 18:16:14 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead