Orissa High Court

CRLMP/1250/2026 of ACCUSED Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.1250 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010608212026 Accused & another …. Petitioners Mr. M. Acharya, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Bibhu Prasad Nayak, AGA Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate for Informant CORAM:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.1250 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010608212026

Accused & another

….

Petitioners

Mr. M. Acharya, Advocate

-Versus-

State of Odisha & another

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. Bibhu Prasad Nayak, AGA

Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate for Informant

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

No.

ORDER

09.09.2026

02.

1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioners seeking quashment of the order of cognizance dated 19th October, 2021 and the entire criminal proceeding in connection with T.R. Case No.104 of 2021 corresponding to Special G.R. Case No.109 of 2021 and further corresponding to Itamati P.S. Case No.41 of 2021 of the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge under POCSO Act, Nayagarh on the grounds stated.

3. Mr. Saktidhar Mishra, learned counsel files the Vakalatnama for the informant and the same is taken on record with a direction that his name be reflected in the brief.

4. A joint affidavit is filed by the petitioners and wife of opposite party No.2 present in Court today and the same is also taken on record. As per the affidavit, it is made to reveal that the petitioners are at present leading a happy conjugal life and in the meantime, two children have been born out of their wedlock. The mother of the victim, namely, wife of opposite party No.2 stated in the joint affidavit that they do not have any objection if the criminal proceeding in TR Case No.104 of 2021 is quashed in view of the subsequent developments having taken place after marriage of the petitioners.

5. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1 series. After completion of investigation and on the chargesheet filed, the learned Special Judge, Nayagarh took cognizance of the offences including one under Sections 6 and 7 of the POCSO Act with other allied offences.

6. State’s response is recorded.

7. In view of the joint affidavit filed and taken on record and received by this Court today and the fact that the petitioners are already married with their marriage having taken place on 21st May, 2021 and that the petitioners are living together and leading a happy conjugal life, this Court is of the view that in exercise of the writ jurisdiction, the criminal proceeding pending before the learned court below for enquiry and trial in connection with TR Case No.104 of 2021, should be quashed in the interest of justice as continuation of the same is likely to subject them to undue harassment having regard to the fact that they were in a relationship and though petitioner No.2 was by then a minor, eloped with petitioner No.1, hence, the missing report and later it has led to the submission of a chargesheet. This Court reiterated the view that since both are settled in life accepted by their families and that the informant’s wife present today in Court admits about the same, the proceeding in connection with and pending before the learned court below corresponding to Special G.R. Case No.109 of 2021 should be brought to an end and terminated and accordingly, it is ordered.

8. In the result, the CRLMP stands disposed of with the proceeding in TR Case No.104 of 2021 pending in the file of Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge under POCSO Act, Nayagarh is hereby quashed.

9. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.

10. A copy of the order be forthwith communicated to the court concerned.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge

T.Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 11-Sep-2026 12:06:23 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead