Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27751/2026 of SALIMA ROUT Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) No.27751 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010667172026 Salima Rout …. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP (C ) No.27751 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010667172026
Salima Rout
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026
3.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. Pursuant to order dtd.31.08.2026, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate basing on the instruction so provided contended that Collector is the competent authority to transfer intra- district of BSSO on administration ground. It is accordingly contended that since Petitioner has been put under deputation by the order of the Collector under Annexure-4, no illegality or irregularity can be found with the same. Accordingly, it is contended that the Writ Petition with the challenge made to Anenxure-4 is liable for dismissal.
4. Mr. S.B. Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that since as per the notification so relied on by the learned State Counsel, Petitioner can made a grievance before the Director-Opp. party No.2 and a representation in that regard has already been made under
// 2 //
Anenxure-7, Opp. Party No.2 be directed to take a decision on Annexure-7 and till such a decision is taken, Petitioner be protected.
5. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and considering the submission made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opp. Party No. 2 to take a decision on Annexure-7, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 2(two) weeks form the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. Till a decision is taken, interim order passed on 31.08.2026 be allowed to continue.
7. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sangita Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44 Signature Not Verified