Orissa High Court
CRLMC/3201/2026 of SANJIB@SANJEEB KUMAR GIRI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.3201 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010689442026 Sanjib@sanjeeb Kumar Giri ..... Appellant Represented by Adv. - Bikash Karna -versus- STATE OF ODISHA ..... Respondent Represented by Adv. - CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 09.09.2026 Order
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3201 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010689442026
Sanjib@sanjeeb Kumar Giri
.....
Appellant
Represented by Adv.
- Bikash Karna
-versus-
STATE OF ODISHA
.....
Respondent
Represented by Adv.
-
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. The present Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed by the Petitioner with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding in Manamunda P.S. Case No.346 of 2026, corresponding to Special Case No.206 of 2026(NDPS), pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kantamal.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, at the outset, submitted that the Petitioner does not want to press this application and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to raise all the points at the appropriate stage by filing an appropriate application.
5. Considering such submission, this CRLMC stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for.
Page 2 of 2.
6. Further, taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of the statement of the co-accused; that in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh v. The State of Tamil Nadu, reported in (2013) 16 SCC 31, the statement of the co-accused cannot be accepted as evidence, so far the present Petitioner is concerned; and that nothing has been recovered from the exclusive and conscious possession of the present Petitioner, therefore, the bar under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act would not be attracted to the fact of the present case; without expressing any opinion and merits of the matter, it is directed that if the Petitioner surrenders before the court in seisin over the matter within four weeks from today and moves an application for bail, the court in seisin over the matter shall consider and dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner in accordance with law on the same day. While considering the bail application of the Petitioner, the court in seisin over the matter shall also keep in view the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh’s case (supra) and shall also take into consideration the applicability of the bar under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act to the facts of the present case and pass necessary order. The Case Diary be made available to the concerned court to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.
( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra )
Judge
Sisir
Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:57:07 Signature Not Verified