Orissa High Court

BLAPL/7057/2026 of SK. ISMILE @ S.K. ISMAIL Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7057 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010480562026 Sk. Ismile @ S.K. Ismail … Petitioner Mr. R.C. Maharana, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.7057 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010480562026

Sk. Ismile @ S.K. Ismail

…

Petitioner

Mr. R.C. Maharana, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa

…

Opposite Party

Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL):09.09.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Gurudijhatia PS Case No.93 of 2013 corresponding to ST Case No.612 of 2013 pending in the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Athagarh, for commission of offence punishable U/Ss.363/395 of IPC.

3. Heard, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Maharana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.C. Pradhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

4. Admittedly, this is a bail jump case, but the petitioner was earlier granted bail by the learned trial Court, however, he did not attend the Court on 20.04.2024 necessitating the learned trial Court to issue NBWA against him, however, the petitioner was arrested on 21.05.2026 and he is in custody since then and, thereby, he must have felt the rigor of law by remaining in custody for flouting the orders of the Court. In the aforesaid premises, this Court by taking a lenient view admits the petitioner to bail.

5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial by attending the Court on each date of posting unless his attendance is dispensed with by the learned trial Court and

(ii) In case the petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge Subhasmita Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 09-Sep-2026 19:36:56 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead