Orissa High Court

CRLMP/875/2026 of SUMAN JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.875 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010477512026 Suman Jena …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dash, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Satyabrata Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 09.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.875 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010477512026

Suman Jena

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Dash, Advocate

-Versus-

State of Odisha & others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. Satyabrata Panda, ASC

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

No.

ORDER

09.09.2026

05.

1. Heard Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State.

2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to the opposite parties, particularly, opposite party Nos.2 and 3 to ensure free, fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in connection with Nandipada P.S. Case No.147 dated 13th April, 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.219 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Hatadihi, Keonjhar seeking such other reliefs including arrest of the accused persons involved in accordance with law.

3. A copy of the FIR is at Annexure-1.

4. Last time, this Court by order dated 20th August, 2026, had directed the State to submit the up-to-date case diary, injury report and all the relevant documents for its perusal and the same is complied with. Mr. Panda, learned ASC submits that the investigation is concluded with the filing of the chargesheet in the month of July, 2026. A copy of the chargesheet with intimation received from opposite party No.3 is submitted to the Court. From the intimation dated 19th August, 2026 of opposite party No.3, it is made to reveal that the injured received a laceration on the head probably caused by a blunt object but injuries are stated to be simple. In the meantime, notice under Section 35(3) BNSS has been served on the accused persons. In view of the above, considering the submission of Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and that, in the meantime, the chargesheet is filed, this Court is of the view that no further direction is necessary. If in case, the petitioner has any other grievance, since an offence under Section 109 BNSS has been deleted as made to appear from the chargesheet, may file a protest petition before the learned court below for appropriate orders.

5. Accordingly, it is ordered.

6. In the result, the CRLMP stands disposed of.

7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge

T.Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 11-Sep-2026 12:06:23 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead