Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28197/2026 of BIJAY KUMAR GUMANSINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28197 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010659672026 Bijay Kumar Gumansingh …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Rath, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 09.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28197 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010659672026
Bijay Kumar Gumansingh
….
Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application and issue Rule NISI to the opp. parties to show cause as to why they shall not be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for his absorption in to the post of Accountant-cum- Data Entry Operator (ADEO) within a stipulated period.
And on their failing to show cause or showing insufficient cause, the said Rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ(s); And pass such further order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper.
// 2 //
And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound ever pray.”.
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.
4.1. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:40:14 Signature Not Verified