Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28487/2026 of BHASKAR GOCHHAYAT Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28487 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010674102026 Bhaskar Gochhayat & Ors. ...… Petitioner (s) Mr. K.C. Dash, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Rajdeep Pradhan, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.28487 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010674102026

Bhaskar Gochhayat &

Ors.

...…

Petitioner (s)

Mr. K.C. Dash,

Advocate

-Versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

…….

Opposite Party (s)

Mr. Rajdeep Pradhan, ASC

CORAM:

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 09.09.2026

01.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard.

3. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioners being encroachers, have challenged the order of eviction notice under Annexure-1 series issued by the Opposite Party No.4/ Tahasildar, Banarpal.

4. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the State submits that there is a clear statutory remedy of appeal available under Section 12(1) of the O.P.L.E. Act against the impugned order under Annexure-1 series. Hence, the Petitioners should approach the concerned Appellate Authority. Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 10-Sep-2026 14:34:39 Signature Not Verified

5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer made in this Writ Petition. However, considering the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioners, this Court permits the Petitioners to file an appeal along with a petition for condonation of delay, if any, so also a petition for interim protection before the concerned Appellate Authority as per Section 12(1) of the O.P.L.E. Act, within a period of 15 working days hence. In such event, Appellate Authority shall conclude the hearing within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal.

6. It is further directed that till the Appeal is taken up, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioners pursuant to the impugned order under Annexure-1 series, issued by the Opposite Party No.4/Tahasildar, Banarpal.

7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)

Judge Gitanjali Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 10-Sep-2026 14:34:39 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead