Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/10157/2026 of KANHU CHARAN MOHANTY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10157 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010670862026 1. Kanhu Charan Mohanty 2. Brajendra Kumar Mohanty 3. Panchu Gopal Bhanja @ Chintu 4. Prakash Kumar Bhanja @ Badal …. Petitioners Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha ….

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 10157 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010670862026

1. Kanhu Charan

Mohanty

2. Brajendra Kumar

Mohanty

3. Panchu Gopal

Bhanja @ Chintu

4. Prakash Kumar

Bhanja @ Badal

….

Petitioners

Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.S. Routray, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. case No.567 of 2026, pending on the file of learned Gramya Nyayalay-cum-J.M.F.C., Bhograi, Balasore, arising out of Talsari Marine P.S. Case No.180 of 2026, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 49/ 54/ 329(2)/ 296/ 115(2)/ 74/ 304(2)/ 351(2)/ 351(3)/ 3(5) of BNS.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the informant and the Petitioners are related and because of some dissension relating to the goods in the stationary shop, the allegations have been made in an exaggerated manner. Hence, the Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

5. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the submissions made, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

7. Additionally, it is directed that Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every 15 days on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin for the next three month or till submission of final form whichever is earlier. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the Court in seisin.

8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

9. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Santoshi

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:41:41 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead