Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27300/2026 of NISHAMANI MOHAPATRA Vs THE DIVISIONAL GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, BHUBANESWAR on 8 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27300 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010605152026 Nishamani Mohapatra …. Petitioner Mr. B. K. Nayak (3), Advocate -versus- The Divisional General Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Bhubaneswar and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Panda,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27300 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010605152026
Nishamani Mohapatra
….
Petitioner
Mr. B. K. Nayak (3), Advocate
-versus-
The Divisional General
Manager, Bharat
Petroleum Corporation
Ltd., Bhubaneswar and
others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P. K. Panda, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.09.2026
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner humbly prays that, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp Parties to show cause, as to why the Opp. Party No. 1 shall not forward the claim dt. 25.5.2026 under Annexure – 5 to the Opp. Party No. 3 immediately for payment of compensation amount of Rs. 2,000,00/- to the petitioner shall not paid immediately.
AND For this act of your kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray..”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a
// 2 //
representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Subrat/Utkalika Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Sep-2026 17:36:55 Signature Not Verified