Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28760/2026 of ULLAS CHANDRA DAS Vs INSPECTOR-IN-CHARGE, KUJANGA POLICE STATION, JAGATSINGHPUR on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.28760 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010669452026 Ullas Chandra Das ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Braja Mohan Sarangi -versus- Inspector-in-Charge, Kujanga Police Station, Jagatsinghpur & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. - Mr.

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.28760 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010669452026

Ullas Chandra Das

.....

Petitioner

Represented by Adv. -

Braja Mohan Sarangi

-versus-

Inspector-in-Charge, Kujanga

Police Station, Jagatsinghpur &

Anr.

.....

Opposite Parties

Represented by Adv. -

Mr. C.M.Singh, A.S.C.

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR

MOHAPATRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026 Order No.

01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner being the owner of the vehicle in question bearing registration No.OD-02-CB-2455 (Tipper) has sought for a direction from this Court to the Opposite Party Nos.1 & 2 for releasing the said vehicle which has been detained by the Inspector-in-Charge, Kujanga Police Station/ Opposite Party No.1 and the Mining Officer, Jagatsinghpur/Opposite Party No.2.

3. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the Parties.

4. Learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that in order to redress his grievance the Petitioner instead of preferring this Writ Petition should have approached the Inspector-in-Charge, Kujanga Police Station/ Opposite Party No.1 at the threshold of the

Page 2 of 2. matter.

5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for granting permission to the Petitioner to do so.

6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and looking to the factual scenario of the case, this Court directs the Petitioner to approach the Inspector-in-Charge, Kujanga Police Station/ Opposite Party No.1 and the Mining Officer, Jagatsinghpur/Opposite Party No.2 along with all the required documents for release of his vehicle in question within a period of ten days hence. In such event, the Opposite Party No.1 shall look into the grievance of the Petitioner and take a decision with regard to release of the above noted vehicle of the Petitioner as per law. It is further made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Aditya Kumar Mohapatra)

Judge

Rubi

Digitally Signed Signed by: RUBI BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 10-Sep-2026 17:43:48 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead