Orissa High Court

TRPCRL/58/2026 of SANTOSH KUMAR SETHY Vs PRAMILA SETHY on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK TRPCRL No.58 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010536832026 Santosh Kumar Sethy …. Petitioner Mr. SK Joned Faiz, Advocate -versus- Pramila Sethy & ors. …. Opposite Parties CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 08.09.2026 01. This matter

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

TRPCRL No.58 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010536832026

Santosh Kumar Sethy

….

Petitioner

Mr. SK Joned Faiz, Advocate

-versus-

Pramila Sethy & ors.

….

Opposite Parties

CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

01. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. This transfer petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-husband for transfer of proceeding in CMC No.130 of 2021, arising out of D.V. Misc. Case No.12 of 2018, from the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Hatadihi to the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak on the grounds detailed in the transfer petition.

3. However, a plea has been taken in the transfer petition that after receiving notice in CMC No.130 of 2021, the Petitioner came to know about the order passed in D.V. Misc. Case No.12 of 2018 and he had no knowledge regarding the said ex-parte order, which is the basis to initiate the execution proceeding against the Petitioner.

4. On being asked as to whether the Petitioner took any steps for setting aside the said ex-parte order passed in

D.V. Misc. Case No.12 of 2018, during hearing, learned Counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the transfer petition to move appropriate application before the learned Court below.

5. Accordingly, the transfer petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding merit of the case of the Petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte order passed in D.V. Misc. Case No.12 of 2018. If the Petitioner moves any application before the Court below, in D.V. Misc. Case No.12 of 2018, the same shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with law.

Banita

(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE

Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 09-Sep-2026 17:02:33 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead