Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/8805/2026 of RUKMINI DEO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8805 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010552492026 1. Rukmini Deo 2. Pratima Deo 3. Sailabala Deo 4. Minati Deo 5. Geeta @ Geetanjali Deo 6. Gulapi Deo 7. Sandhya Rani Deo 8. Rina @ Runita Deo 9. Panchala Deo 10. Shyam Sundar Deo 11. Biranchi Narayan Deo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 8805 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010552492026

1. Rukmini Deo

2. Pratima Deo

3. Sailabala Deo

4. Minati Deo

5. Geeta @ Geetanjali Deo

6. Gulapi Deo

7. Sandhya Rani Deo

8. Rina @ Runita Deo

9. Panchala Deo

10. Shyam Sundar Deo

11. Biranchi Narayan Deo

12. Kabiraj Deo

13. Girija Shankar Deo

….

Petitioners

Mr. R. Achary, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.27 of 2026 pending on the file learned J.M.F.C., Muniguda arising out of Ambadola P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 pending on the file of for commission of offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 126(2)/ 296/ 351(3)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 109(1)/ 190 of BNS, 2023.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the allegation levelled must be viewed in the background of civil litigation inter se between the parties and since the injured is stated to have been suffered simple injury, the Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that in the meanwhile some of the co-accused who were taken into custody have been enlarged on bail.

6. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

7. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Ayesha Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:40:04 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead