Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27675/2026 of DHARANIDHAR SAHU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27675 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010641532026 Dharanidhar Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. S. Roy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. P. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 08.09.2026 01. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27675 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010641532026
Dharanidhar Sahu
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. Roy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. P. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and issue Rule “NISI” to the Opp. Parties to show cause as to;
(i) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to grant regular pension as due and admissible in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. May, 2026 as provided under OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 within a stipulated time; and
(ii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction and disburse the arrear pension as due and admissible on such sanction of regular pension within a stipulated time; And if the Opp. Parties do not show cause, then the Rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ/writs and any other order as deem fit be passed;
// 2 //
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Subrat/Utkalika Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Sep-2026 17:36:55 Signature Not Verified