Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/8787/2026 of BAPUNI NAYAK @ DIBA DALEI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 8787 of 2026 CNR NO. ODHC010551122026 1. Bapuni Nayak @ Diba Dalei 2. Bipin Nayak @ Dipu Dalei 3. Tukuna Dalei @ Gudu Dalei 4. Sudarshan Nayak @ Buta …. Petitioners Mr. A . Tripathy, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Informant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 8787 of 2026

CNR NO. ODHC010551122026

1. Bapuni Nayak @ Diba

Dalei

2. Bipin Nayak @ Dipu

Dalei

3. Tukuna Dalei @ Gudu

Dalei

4. Sudarshan Nayak @

Buta

….

Petitioners

Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha

2. Informant

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.349 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C, Daspalla arising out of Daspalla P.S. Case No.181 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 74/ 296/ 115(2)/ 329(3)/ 140(3)/ 62/ 351(2)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

3. At the outset, in spite of due service of notice, there is no appearance on behalf of the Informant when the matter is called.

4. The threat perception expressed by the Informant in a letter addressed to the Court is on record.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that it’s a case of false implication. Hence, the Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

6. Learned counsel for the State while opposing the prayer for pre-arrest bail brings to the notice of this Court that there is no injury.

7. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

8. Additionally, it is directed that the Petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every week on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin for the next three months. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

9. To instill a sense of confidence in the Informant, it is further directed that Petitioners shall not in any way try to intimidate the Informant and/or her family.

10. It shall be open for the Prosecution/Informant to seek variance of this order in the event there is any threat perception.

11. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

12. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Ayesha Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:40:04 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead