Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/10165/2026 of MUNA JENA @ SANKARSAN JENA @ SANKARSHANA JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10165 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010674202026 Muna Jena @ Sankarsan Jena @ Sankarshana Jena …. Petitioner Mr. M. Nandy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 10165 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010674202026

Muna Jena @

Sankarsan Jena @

Sankarshana Jena

….

Petitioner

Mr. M. Nandy, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. case No.1607 of 2026, pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C. (R). Cog. Berhampur, Ganjam, arising out of Berhampur Sadar P.S. Case No.532 of 2026, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 112(2) of BNS read with Section 3 of Orissa, Prevention of Gambling Act.

3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

4. Taking into account the nature of allegation, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of Petitioner not being accused for commission of any offence which triable by Court of Session.

5. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner is cited as an accused for commission of any offence which is triable by the Court of Session, this order shall not be given effect to.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

8. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Santoshi

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:41:39 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead