Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25643/2026 of KAMAR ARA BEGUM @ SAYED KAMAR ARA BEGUM Vs THE TAHASILDAR, JAGATSINGHPUR on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 25643 2026 ODHC010595552026 Kamar Ara Begum @ Sayed Kamar Ara Begum ..... Petitioner Represented by Mr. S.N.B. Ray, Advocate -versus- The Tahasildar, Jagatsinghpur & Ors ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 25643 2026

ODHC010595552026

Kamar Ara Begum @ Sayed

Kamar Ara Begum

.....

Petitioner

Represented by

Mr. S.N.B. Ray,

Advocate

-versus-

The Tahasildar, Jagatsinghpur

& Ors

.....

Opposite Parties

Represented by

Mr. G. Mohanty,

Standing Counsel

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.09.2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following order:- “The petitioner therefore prayed that your Lordship's will graciously be pleased to admit this application and after hearing the petitioner's Advocate issue a Writ in nature of certiorari or any other suitable writ, direct the 0pp. Party No.1/Tahasildar, Jagatsinghpur to consider the representation of the petitioner under Aimexure-4 Series Order No.

1. Page 2 of 2. and accept the rent against the Plot of petitioner under Aimexure-2 for the interest of justice; And pass such other direction/ orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem in the circumstances of the case. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

4. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s rent was accepted till 2023 and has not been accepted thereafter, and that the petitioner has submitted a representation in this regard addressed to the Tahasildar, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Jagatsinghpur to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner by passing a reasoned order within four weeks from today.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge

B.C. Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 09-Sep-2026 19:40:45 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead