Orissa High Court
BLAPL/6226/2026 of OMPRAKASH JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.6226 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010448302026 Omprakash Jena … Petitioner Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL)08.09.2026 02. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6226 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010448302026
Omprakash Jena
…
Petitioner
Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…
Opposite Party
Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL)08.09.2026
02.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Rajgangpur PS Case No.78 of 2026 corresponding to GR Case No.143 of 2026 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Rajgangpur for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 331(3)/305(a)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing theft of Rs.15,000/- and a mobile by trespassing into the house of the informant, along with co-accused persons in furtherance of their common intention.
3. Heard, Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.
4. After having considered the rival submission and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusation sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 03.02.2026 with submission of charge- sheet in the meantime and taking into account the mode and manner of implication of the present petitioner in this case together with his name not being mentioned in the FIR and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and trial being not likely to be concluded in near future and the alleged recovery of Rs.3200/- from the petitioner, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail.
5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it.
6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.
7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
Jayakrushna Digitally Signed Signed by: JAYAKRUSHNA DASH Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Sep-2026 20:37:53 Signature Not Verified