Orissa High Court
CRLMC/3153/2026 of SWATIPRIYA MISHRA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 8 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.23733 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010593872025 Pradip Kumar Ray ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Shambhu Charan Nath Sharma -versus- 1) M/S.SRIKRISHNA ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD, BBSR ..... Opposite Parties 2) MANORANJAN BHUYAN 3) NATIONAL
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.23733 of 2025
CNR No. ODHC010593872025
Pradip Kumar Ray
.....
Petitioner
Represented by Adv. -
Shambhu Charan Nath Sharma
-versus-
1) M/S.SRIKRISHNA
ESTATE AND
CONSTRUCTION PVT.
LTD, BBSR
.....
Opposite Parties
2) MANORANJAN
BHUYAN
3) NATIONAL CONSUMER
DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGISTRAR, NEW DELHI
Represented by Adv. -
BISHNU PRASAD SARANGI,
G.DASH,B.PATTNAIK
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.09.2026
Order No.
I.A. No.16787 of 2026
05.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed for correction of the cause title of order dated 08.07.2026.
3. In view of the aforesaid position, earlier order this Court dated 08.07.2026 is modified to the extent that the cause title shall now be corrected and read as “Pradip Kumar Ray” as Petitioner
Page 2 of 2. and “(1) M/s. Srikrishna Estate and Construction Pvt. Ltd. BBSR,
(2) Manoranjan Bhuyan, (3) National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Represented by its Registrar, New Delhi” as Opposite Parties”.
4. The names are reflected in the cause title be appropriately corrected. Further the Opposite Party No.1 is directed to act upon production of a certified copy of the order by the Petitioner.
5. Further the Petitioner who is appearing in person before this Court submitted that despite submission of the documents with regard to the collateral security, i.e. in respect of a residential house situated in CDA, Cuttack along with the relevant papers, the same has not been accepted by the SCDRC as of now. In such view of the matter, a further direction is issued to the learned SCDRC to act upon such collateral security subject to verification of the genuineness of such documents, preferably within a period of two weeks from today. Further, liberty is granted to the learned SCDRC to suitably modify and alter the condition or delete the same in the event it is found that the review petition filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court has already been dismissed in the meantime. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to raise that point before the SCDRC, the SCDRC shall pass necessary consequential order.
6. Accordingly, the I.A. stands allowed.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Sisir
Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 09-Sep-2026 19:18:19 Signature Not Verified