Orissa High Court
CMP/17/2017 of BHARATI PATRA Vs SUBHASINI PATRO on 8 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.17 of 2017 [CNR No.- ODHC010446472017 ] Bharati Patra …. Petitioner Mr. Satyam Das Pattnaik , Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Advocate -versus- 1. Subhasini Patro 2. Pinki Patro 3. Ranjali Patro 4. Pushpanjali Patro 5. Nimaya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No.17 of 2017
[CNR No.- ODHC010446472017 ]
Bharati Patra
….
Petitioner
Mr. Satyam Das Pattnaik , Advocate
on behalf of
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
1. Subhasini Patro
2. Pinki Patro
3. Ranjali Patro
4. Pushpanjali Patro
5. Nimaya Charan Sahu
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. S. Rath, Advocate
and Mr. S. Mohapatra, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. A. Behera, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
06. 08.09.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This matter is taken up from the weekly list.
2. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 28.10.2015 passed in Civil Suit No.65 of 2013 (C.S. No.138 of 2016) by the learned Civil judge (Junior Division), Berhampur rejecting the application filed by the Plaintiff-Petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC read with Section 151 CPC and Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC.
3. While issuing notice on 11.01.2017 this Court had stayed further proceeding in the suit.
4. Mr. Satyam Das Pattnaik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that they do not have instructions about the present status of the suit.
5. Mr. S. Rath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Behera, learned counsel for the Opposite Parties No.1, 2, 3 and 4 submits that Civil Suit No.65 of 2013 was dismissed on 22.04.2022. CMA No. 18 of 2024 which had been filed for setting aside the order dated 22.04.2022 has been dismissed on contest on 30.03.2026.
6. A copy of the order passed in the CMA is filed in Court and taken on record.
7. In view of the dismissal of the Civil Suit as well as the CMA filed for restoration of the suit, nothing remains to be decided in this CMP, which is accordingly dismissed.
8. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated and Misc. Case No.20 of 2017 stands disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Sep-2026 19:07:49 Signature Not Verified