Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26852/2026 of JNYANENDRANATH JENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26852 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010633692026 Jnyanendranath Jena …. Petitioner Mr. M. K. Pati, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R. K. Bisoi, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa and Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26852 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010633692026
Jnyanendranath Jena
….
Petitioner
Mr. M. K. Pati, Advocate on behalf of
Mr. R. K. Bisoi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as narrated above, it is ardently prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Party No.1 to count the entire period of service rendered by the petitioner towards pension and other retirement benefits and sanction and disburse the pension and other retirement benefits w.e.f. 1.12.2022 onwards as per OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 with arrears of pension within a time stipulation as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
And/or issue any other appropriate writ/ writs, order/orders, direction /directions as deem fit and proper in the fitness of the case.
And for this act of this kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”.
// 2 //
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-7 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Jyoti/Utkalika Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Sep-2026 17:33:12 Signature Not Verified