Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/3886/2026 of BANITA PALTASINGH @ PALATASINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 3 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.3886 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010228842026 1. Banita Paltasingh @ Paltasingh 2. Smitarani Gajendra …. Petitioners Mr.A.K. Subudhi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr.S.Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.3886 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010228842026

1. Banita Paltasingh @

Paltasingh

2. Smitarani Gajendra

….

Petitioners

Mr.A.K. Subudhi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr.S.Panigrahi, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.09.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.612 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C. (O), Bhubaneswar, arising out of Chandaka P.S. Case No.153 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act.

3. Learned State Counsel, while opposing the prayer for pre-arrest bail, submits that since the charge-sheet has been filed against the Petitioners, prima facie case against them is made out. Hence, no leniency ought to be shown to them.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that considering the background in which the applications are made essentially the dispute between two brothers and referring to the nature of injuries, it is said that ex-facie it refers to section 109 of BNS.

5. This Court perused the injury report and the statements on record. Considering the same, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

6. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

7. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

8. In view of disposal of the ABLAPL, pending I.As, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Basu Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 03-Sep-2026 20:53:28 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead