Orissa High Court
WP(C)/21041/2025 of K.NILAMADHAB ACHARY @ NILAMADHAB ACHARY K. Vs BRANCH HEAD KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD., WEST BENGAL on 3 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). NO.21041 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010516282025 K. Nilamadhab Achary @ Nilamadhab Achary K. …. Petitioner Mr. Sujit Kumar Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- Branch Head Karur Vysya Bank Limited and another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE K.R.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). NO.21041 of 2025
CNR No. ODHC010516282025
K. Nilamadhab Achary @ Nilamadhab
Achary K.
….
Petitioner
Mr. Sujit Kumar Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
Branch Head Karur Vysya Bank
Limited and another
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 03.09.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following relief: “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(i) allow and admit this Writ Petition and thereby direct/order the Opp. Parties to consider the representation as at Annexure-2 to the Writ Petition and thereby make a One Time Settlement (O.T.S.) of said loan Account for the interest of justice;
(ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
3. It is submitted by Mr. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the Petitioner that the loan amount has been settled under the One Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Sep-2026 15:39:45 Signature Not Verified
Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme and he has deposited 50 per cent of the settled amount.
4. Since it is submitted that the matter has already been settled under the OTS Scheme, the prayer made in the writ petition does not survive. If the Petitioner has any further grievances, he may, if so advised, may approach the Bank for redressal of the same.
5. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of without any interference of the Court, but with an observation that the Petitioner, if so advised, may approach the Bank for redressal of the grievances.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Rojalin Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Sep-2026 15:39:45 Signature Not Verified