Orissa High Court
FAO/901/2026 of CHANDU RAMAJI CHANORE Vs UNION OF INDIA on 3 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.901 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010591992026 Chandu Ramaji Chanore & Anr. …. Appellants Mr. D. Patnaik, Advocate -versus- Union of India …. Respondents Mr. G. Sethi, Sr. Panel Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.901 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010591992026
Chandu Ramaji Chanore
& Anr.
….
Appellants
Mr. D. Patnaik, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India
….
Respondents
Mr. G. Sethi, Sr. Panel Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026
I.A. No.1187 of 2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Considering the grounds taken and the fact that appeal has been filed by the claimant, this Court is inclined to condone the delay in filing of the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the I.A stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge FAO No.901 of 2026
02. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
// 2 //
2. The present appeal at the instance of the Claimants/ Appellants is directed against the judgment/award dated 28.04.2026 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in case No. OA(IIU)/ 42/2025.
3. The brief fact of the case is that on dtd.06.06.2024, the deceased was travelling from Visakhapatnam to Raipur railway station by Visakhapatnam- Durga Express and on the way, the deceased accidentally fell down from the said train and died on the spot. Accordingly, a criminal case vide UD Case No.21 dated 07.06.2024 was registered.
4. It is stated that the deceased was a bona fide passenger.
5. Learned counsel for the Appellants further contends that the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- in favour of the Appellants. However, the Appellant Nos.1 & 2 have been permitted to withdraw only 10% of their respective shares from the said awarded amount. He further submits that since the Appellant Nos.1 & 2 are going through financial hardship, they may be permitted to withdraw 50% of their respective shares from the said awarded amount.
6. In such view of the matter, this Court modifies only that part of the judgment dated 28.04.2026
// 3 //
passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case No. OA(IIU)/42/2025 and directs that the Appellant Nos.1 & 2 shall be permitted to withdraw 50% of their share from the awarded amount as awarded in the judgment dated 28.04.2026.
7. This FAO is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Subrat
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 10-Sep-2026 17:17:15 Signature Not Verified