Orissa High Court

WP(C)/25817/2026 of RASMITA NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 3 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25817 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010584132026 Rasmita Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. C. Sahani, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.25817 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010584132026

Rasmita Nayak

….

Petitioner

Mr. C. Sahani, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

COROM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.09.2026

1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore humbly prays that your Lordship would graciously be pleased to :

(i) Admit the Writ Petition,

(ii) Call for the relevant records AND

(iii) After hearing the counsels for the parties further be pleased to quash the impugned disengagement order dated 06.08.2024 issued by the Opp. Party No. 4 at Annexure - 8 and direct the Opp. Party No. 4 & 5 to reinstate the Petitioner as Community Resource Person (CRP) in Maradhapalli CLF under Gadasahi Gram Panchayat of Kanas Block of Puri district. And any other order/ orders or direction/ directions may be issued so as to give complete relief to the petitioner.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. Opposite Party No.3 is directed to give a hearing to the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.6 while taking a decision on the Petitioner’s claim.

7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge

Mili Digitally Signed Signed by: MILI MAHARANA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 07-Sep-2026 14:28:18 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead