Orissa High Court

WP(C)/22182/2026 of PRIYAMBADA SATPATHY Vs UNION OF INDIA on 3 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 22182 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010493732026 Priyambada Satpathy ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Patra (1), Advocate -versus- Union of India & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC Mr. D. Satapathy, Sr. P.C., (for Opp. No.1) Mr. U. Mishra, Adv.

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 22182 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010493732026

Priyambada Satpathy

.....

Petitioner

Mr. S. Patra (1), Advocate

-versus-

Union of India & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. S.P. Das, ASC

Mr. D. Satapathy, Sr. P.C.,

(for Opp. No.1)

Mr. U. Mishra, Adv.

(for Opp. No.3)

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.09.2026 Order No. 02

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: -

“Under the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner therefore prays that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue appropriate Writ/Writ(s) in the nature of writs of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to immediately calculate, sanction, and credit the accrued interest amounting to Rs.78712/- on the PF account balance of Rs.11,44,900/- for the period from 01.04.2024 to 31.01.2025 to the Petitioner's account, along with upto date interest.”

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation

Page 2 of 2. vide Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Mili Digitally Signed Signed by: MILI MAHARANA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 07-Sep-2026 14:28:17 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead