Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26667/2026 of SAYEED HASIM ALLI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26667 of 2026 ODHC010631432026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 02.09.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26667 of 2026
ODHC010631432026
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore, prays that your lordship may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Petition and issue a Rule NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to file their show cause as to why this Writ Application shall not be allowed and after hearing counsel from both sides this Hon’ble Court kindly issue a writ in the nature of a writ of Mandamus by directing the O.P. No.3 i.e., Tahasildar, Kishannagar for demarcation of his land of the petitioner in pursuance to Demarcation Case No.89 of 2026 bearing Khata No.739/388 Plot No.1516 measuring an area of Ac0.021 dec. of Mouza- Samantarapur in the district of Cuttack within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon’ble Court for the ends of justice and equity.
And pass any other order/orders direction/directions as deemed fit and proper; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
Sayeed Hasim Alli .… Petitioner Represented by
Mr. S.C. Das, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by
Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel Order No.
02.
4. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the demarcation case filed by him has not been disposed of as yet.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Kishannagar to conclude the Demarcation Case No.89 of 2026 as early as possible, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Puspanjali Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI GHADAI Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 02-Sep-2026 17:40:37 Signature Not Verified