Orissa High Court

WP(C)/24564/2026 of SANGRAM KESHARI PARIDA Vs SUPERINTED, CGST AND CENTAL EXCISE, PURI-II RANGE, PURI on 2 September 2026

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.24564 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010583982026 Sangram Keshari Parida …. Petitioner Represented by Adv.– Ms. Itishree Tripathy, Advocate -Versus- The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, Puri-II Range …. Opposite Party

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.24564 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010583982026

Sangram Keshari Parida

….

Petitioner

Represented by Adv.–

Ms. Itishree Tripathy, Advocate

-Versus-

The Superintendent of CGST and

Central Excise, Puri-II Range

….

Opposite Party

Represented by Adv._

Mr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

AND

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

ORDER

02.09.2026 (Hybrid mode)

01.

1. Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits that the show cause notice dated 12th June, 2024 followed by order dated 13th August, 2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is under challenge. She submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return. She relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others), wherein it has been observed as follows:-

Page 1 of 2

"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

1.1. She submits, the claim of the petitioner to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

2. Learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for the Department-opposite party upon perusal of said order, conceded that in the event the petitioner complies with the requirement and deposits the amounts as undertaken, the authority concerned shall do the needful.

3. In view of conceded position, the petitioner shall make payments as undertaken within a period of two weeks hence and on such eventuality the opposite party shall consider application for revocation of cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from today.

4. In view of the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge

(M.S. Raman) Judge

Laxmikant Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 10:33:36 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead