Orissa High Court
WP(C)/27915/2026 of MANORANJAN SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.27915 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010668212026 Manoranjan Sahoo ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. Lucky Mohanty -versus- State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. J.K. Ray, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.27915 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010668212026
Manoranjan Sahoo
.....
Petitioner
Represented by Adv. –
Mr. Lucky Mohanty
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
.....
Opposite Parties
Represented by Adv. –
Mr. J.K. Ray, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as the documents annexed thereto.
3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:- “The petitioner therefore most humbly pray that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ application, to issue notice to the Opp. Parties and after hearing the parties, to direct to the opp. parties to consider the grievance of the petitioner to regularized the loan account in suitable instalments / rephasement and not to disturb the possession of the vehicle and not to cancel the certificate of registration of the vehicle No. OD1P5607 in the interest of justice;
And/or pass such other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the fact and
Page 2 of 2. circumstances of the present case.”
4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner has already approached the Opposite Party No.4-Branch Manager, Tata Capital Limited, Angul for settlement of the loan account. He further submitted that since no decision has been taken by the Opposite Party No.4 with regard to such settlement by apprehending transfer of ownership by the Opposite Party No.3, he has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition at the stage of admission with the direction that in the event any such application is filed by the Petitioner before the Opposite Party No.4-Branch Manager, Tata Capital Limited, Angul is pending consideration, the Opposite Party No.4 is directed to consider and dispose of the application of the Petitioner in accordance with applicable law/rules, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is needless to mention here that the representation of the Petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Any decision so taken on the said application shall be communicated to the Petitioner immediately.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Debasis
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 07-Sep-2026 19:46:44 Signature Not Verified