Orissa High Court
ABLAPL/10065/2026 of DHIRAJ KUMAR SAH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10065 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010646392026 Dhiraj Kumar Sah …. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Raut, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa …. Opposite Party Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 02.09.2026 01. 1. Heard
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 10065 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010646392026
Dhiraj Kumar Sah
….
Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Raut, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
….
Opposite Party
Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.2516 of 2025 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Jharsuguda arising out of Jharsuguda P.S. Case No.577 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Section 318(4)/319(1)/336(4)/338/340/61(2) of BNS Act read with Section 66(C) /66(D) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.
4. It is submitted that charge sheet has been filed on 11.02.2026
5. On bare perusal of the same, it is seen that the investigation has been kept open to probe the complicity of the other accused persons.
6. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the Petitioner has criminal proclivity of commission of similar offence.
7. Taking into account the nature of allegations and that the accusation relates to operation of mule accounts and the ramification thereof, this Court is not inclined to entertain the ABLAPL notwithstanding the filing of the charge sheet. However, in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case and moves an application for his release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit.
8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Sep-2026 20:56:57 Signature Not Verified