Orissa High Court
WP(C)/25654/2026 of NIRAKAR SENAPATI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 September 2026
of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.25654 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010602912026 Nirakar Senapati and another ..... Petitioners Represented by Adv. Mr. S.K. Baral, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. D. Lenka, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.25654 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010602912026
Nirakar Senapati and
another
.....
Petitioners
Represented by Adv.
Mr. S.K. Baral,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
.....
Opposite Parties
Represented by
Mr. D. Lenka, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State.
3. The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayer:- “In the circumstances, it is prayed therefore your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit the application, issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing the parties, direction be issue to opp. party authorities more particularly Opp. Party Nos. 2 and 3 to look in the grievance of the petitioners under Annexure -3 series relying upon the inquiry report under Annexure-4 and direction be issue to Opp. Party No.3 to take immediate step for clearance of obstruction to the only passage of the petitioners situated in Plot No. Order No.
1. Page 2 of 2. 913 (Sarbasadharan Rasta) to the Stitiban plot of the petitioners i.e. Plot No. 915 by restraining the private opp. party Nos. 5 to 7 in creating any disturbance with help of Opp. Party No.4, i.e. the IIC, Pattamundai P.S. for the interest of justice.
And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as deems just and proper in the circumstances of the case.
And for which act of kindness, the petitioners, as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the R.I, Shasan Circle, Pattamundai by his letter dated 12.01.2026 addressed to the Tahasildar, Pattamundai had recommended demarcation of the disputed plots for resolution of the dispute.
5. It is the petitioners’ grievance that no action has been taken on such recommendation even till date. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Pattamundai to take note of the recommendation of the R.I. and issue appropriate order for demarcation of the plots in question. The whole exercise must be completed within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioners.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
B.C. Tudu
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 02-Sep-2026 17:57:34 Signature Not Verified