Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28131/2026 of SUKANTI LAKRA Vs ODISHA GRAMEEN BANK, KHORDA on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28131 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010672772026 Sukanti Lakra …. Petitioner Mr. A . Das, Advocate -versus- Odisha Grameen Bank, Khorda & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28131 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010672772026
Sukanti Lakra
….
Petitioner
Mr. A. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Odisha Grameen Bank,
Khorda & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. Considering the order going to be passed, this Court is of the view that no notice need be issued to the Opposite Parties –Bank.
4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why:
// 2 //
1. The order of transfer dtd. 05.05.2026 under Annexure-1 issued by O.P. No.2 shall not be quashed/modified after declaring the same as illegal;
2. The O.P. No. 2 shall not be directed to dispose of the representation dtd. 24.05.2026 under Annexure-4 within a stipulated period keeping in view the transfer policy dtd. 01.04.2026 under Annexure-2 as well as the order of transfer of similarly situated person under Annexure-3.
If the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the Rule may be made absolute; And pass any other order / orders as would be deem fit and proper; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray”.
5. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
6. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
// 3 //
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat
Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Sep-2026 11:15:49 Signature Not Verified